Compare CoreSite

Compare DartPoints and CoreSite for Data Center & Colocation

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and reliability to find the best data center & colocation solution.

Comprehensive comparison of DartPoints vs CoreSite Data Center platforms, with expert guidance from SmashByte's deployment team.

Why Compare DartPoints vs CoreSite?

Both DartPoints and CoreSite are established players in the data center & colocation market, but they take fundamentally different approaches to features, pricing, and support. This comparison helps you understand which platform aligns better with your specific requirements, existing infrastructure, and growth trajectory.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • DartPoints: Known for cabinets maxed out with 18-month wait for more space, but offers strong low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp
  • CoreSite: Focuses on scalable power up to 30kw per cabinet with emphasis on carrier-neutral mmr with 100+ networks

Feature Comparison

When evaluating Data Center platforms, the features that matter most depend on your use case. DartPoints excels in certain scenarios—particularly for teams that prioritize low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp—while CoreSite shines for organizations that need scalable power up to 30kw per cabinet.

Pricing & Total Cost of Ownership

List price rarely tells the full story. DartPoints and CoreSite have different pricing structures, volume discount thresholds, and hidden costs. SmashByte helps you calculate true 3-year TCO including implementation, training, and ongoing support.

SmashByte's Assessment

We've deployed both platforms across industries including healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The "right" choice depends on factors like existing infrastructure, in-house technical expertise, compliance requirements, and growth plans.

Schedule a free consultation with SmashByte to get a customized comparison based on your specific environment. We'll provide pricing benchmarks, reference architectures, and implementation timelines for both options.

Issues Others Are Having

Cabinets maxed out with 18-month wait for more space

Creates operational bottlenecks and increases total cost of ownership.

Fix

SmashByte helps you evaluate which platform better addresses this through proof-of-concept testing.

Power density limited to 5kW per cabinet

Impacts deployment timeline and ongoing management complexity.

Fix

We provide implementation best practices and cost optimization strategies for both platforms.

Recommended Architecture

For most enterprises, we recommend a phased evaluation approach: start with a 30-day pilot of DartPoints or CoreSite in a single department or location, establish clear success metrics, then scale based on results. SmashByte can help you design a proof-of-concept that minimizes risk while providing data-driven decision criteria.

Solutions by Need

See all →

Playbook

Need Carrier-neutral MMR with 100+ networks? CoreSite vs Alternatives

The Data Center market offers many options, but only a few truly excel at carrier-neutral mmr with 100+ networks.

View need page

Playbook

Need Low-latency peering to AWS, Azure, and GCP? CoreSite vs Alternatives

Low-latency peering to AWS, Azure, and GCP has become a top priority as enterprises face power density limited to 5kw per cabinet.

View need page

Playbook

Need Scalable power up to 30kW per cabinet? CoreSite vs Alternatives

Scalable power up to 30kW per cabinet isn't optional—it's essential for modern data center & colocation deployments. But not all platforms deliver it equally.

View need page