Solution by Need

Flexential Review: Low-latency peering to AWS, Azure, and GCP Capabilities

Real-world assessment of Flexential's low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp capabilities based on customer deployments.

Low-latency peering to AWS, Azure, and GCP Solution Brief

Download our detailed brief outlining how leading Data Center platforms deliver low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp, with pricing comparisons and implementation timelines.

Get Solution Brief

Organizations struggle with justifying colo costs vs hyperscaler pricing, making low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp a critical requirement.

Why Low-latency peering to AWS, Azure, and GCP Matters

In today's fast-paced business environment, low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp isn't a nice-to-have—it's table stakes. Organizations that lack low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp frequently struggle with justifying colo costs vs hyperscaler pricing, leading to operational inefficiencies, frustrated teams, and lost revenue opportunities.

How Flexential Addresses This Need

Flexential takes a comprehensive approach to low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp, combining native platform capabilities with professional services and ongoing support. Their solution includes:

  • Core Platform Features: Native functionality designed specifically for low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp, avoiding the need for third-party add-ons
  • Integration Capabilities: Pre-built connectors to existing systems including CRM, ERP, and collaboration tools
  • Professional Services: Implementation support to accelerate time-to-value and ensure best practices
  • Ongoing Optimization: Proactive monitoring and recommendations to maintain performance over time

Alternative Approaches

Other Data Center providers take different approaches to low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp. Some offer more out-of-the-box functionality at the expense of customization flexibility. Others provide greater control but require more in-house expertise to configure and maintain.

The optimal approach depends on factors including:

  • Existing technical team capabilities and bandwidth
  • Integration requirements with legacy systems
  • Compliance and security constraints
  • Budget for implementation and ongoing management
  • Timeline pressures and deployment urgency

SmashByte's Recommendation

We've found that low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp requirements vary significantly by industry, company size, and existing infrastructure. Rather than declaring a single "best" solution, we help you identify which platform's approach aligns with your specific constraints and goals.

Our evaluation process includes:

  1. Requirements workshop to define success criteria
  2. Platform comparison across 3-5 vendors
  3. Proof-of-concept testing in your environment
  4. TCO analysis including hidden costs
  5. Implementation planning and risk mitigation

Schedule a consultation with SmashByte to get a customized assessment of how Flexential and alternatives stack up for your low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp requirements.

Pain Points We Address

  • Power density limited to 5kW per cabinet
  • Cross-connects cost $500 each
  • Justifying colo costs vs hyperscaler pricing

Recommended Suppliers

Flexential

Proven track record delivering low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp with strong customer references.

View marketplace listing

Centersquare

Different architectural approach with unique trade-offs worth evaluating.

View marketplace listing

Rackspace

Emerging platform with innovative features in low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp space.

View marketplace listing