Comprehensive comparison of S-NET vs GigTel SIP Trunking platforms, with expert guidance from SmashByte's deployment team.
Why Compare S-NET vs GigTel?
Both S-NET and GigTel are established players in the sip trunking & wholesale voice market, but they take fundamentally different approaches to features, pricing, and support. This comparison helps you understand which platform aligns better with your specific requirements, existing infrastructure, and growth trajectory.
Key Differences at a Glance
- S-NET: Known for outbound calls show "spam likely" without stir/shaken, but offers strong 99.99% call completion rate with sla
- GigTel: Focuses on full stir/shaken attestation level a with emphasis on automatic e911 updates via portal
Feature Comparison
When evaluating SIP Trunking platforms, the features that matter most depend on your use case. S-NET excels in certain scenarios—particularly for teams that prioritize 99.99% call completion rate with sla—while GigTel shines for organizations that need full stir/shaken attestation level a.
Pricing & Total Cost of Ownership
List price rarely tells the full story. S-NET and GigTel have different pricing structures, volume discount thresholds, and hidden costs. SmashByte helps you calculate true 3-year TCO including implementation, training, and ongoing support.
SmashByte's Assessment
We've deployed both platforms across industries including healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The "right" choice depends on factors like existing infrastructure, in-house technical expertise, compliance requirements, and growth plans.
Schedule a free consultation with SmashByte to get a customized comparison based on your specific environment. We'll provide pricing benchmarks, reference architectures, and implementation timelines for both options.